Skip navigation
Prison Legal News
× You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.

Relation Back Period Suspended during IFP Application

Loaded on June 15, 1997 published in Prison Legal News June, 1997, page 22
Filed under: Filing Fees (PLRA), Civil Procedure, Complaints, Limitations, Filing Fees. Location: Pennsylvania.
The court of appeals for the third circuit held that the 120 day period allowed for amending complaints under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) is suspended while a district court makes an In Forma Pauperis (IFP) determination under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Donald Urrutia, a Pennsylvania state prisoner, sued various police agencies claiming ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Prison Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. America's Private Gulag, by Ken Silverstein
  2. Speedy Death Penalty Provisions Enjoined in California
  3. Strange Bedfellows; CCA's Political Connections, by Alex Friedmann
  4. Texas Sheriff Exploits Prisoner Labor
  5. From the Editor, by Paul Wright
  6. Grievance Retaliation Unconstitutional
  7. Qualified Immunity for Strip Search
  8. PLRA Not Enough for Fourth Circuit
  9. Sixth Circuit Issues PLRA IFP Order
  10. Fifth Circuit Holds that PLRA Requires Fees in All Pending Cases
  11. Ninth Circuit: PLRA Doesn't Apply to Habeas
  12. Massachusetts Court Avoids Ruling on Consent Decree Termination
  13. Pro Se Tips and Tactics (Declaratory Relief), by John Midgley
  14. Federal Parolees Kicked off Internet
  15. Texas Prison Building Corruption, Problems and Dangers
  16. A Matter of Fact
  17. Jury Verdict in Prisoner Attack Affirmed
  18. On the Edge of Midnight, by Mr Wolf
  19. CDC Consent Decree Contempt Vacated
  20. California Prisoner Wins Judgment Against Guard in Shooting
  21. PLN Readers Dissatisfied with Freedom Press
  22. California Slave Labor Loses Money
  23. Denial of Eyeglasses Violates Eighth Amendment
  24. Swastika Carved on CDC Prison Guard Rifle
  25. Illinois Jail Conditions Suit States Claim
  26. FTCA Suit Not Barred by Prior Bivens Claim
  27. Trial Required on ADA EFV Claim
  28. California Prisoners Entitled to Contact Attorney Visits
  29. No Frivolousness Review Allowed When Filing Fee Paid
  30. Book Review - Privatization and the Provision of Correctional Services: Context and Consequences
  31. Iowa Retaliation Verdict Affirmed
  32. Pro Se Litigant Entitled to Defendant's Identity
  33. Relation Back Period Suspended during IFP Application
  34. 'Scared Straight' Youths Molested in Texas Prison
  35. Prison NA Meetings Violate Establishment Clause
  36. BOP Owes Duty of Care to Prisoners
  37. TB Isolation May Violate RFRA
  38. News in Brief
  39. Habeas Petition Not Mooted by Segregation Release
  40. BOP Can't Set Restitution
  41. Wisconsin RFRA Jewelry Ruling Affirmed
  42. Mississippi Detainees Awarded Damages in Disciplinary Suit
  43. Prisoners' Spouses Challenge Washington 35% Law
  44. Massachusetts Prisoners Awarded Back Pay
  45. $7,500 Awarded in Guard Beating

More from these topics: